self constituted a variety arenas relation multiple traditions. Self-h — Michael Kenny, Politics Identity: Liberal Political Theory Dilemas Difference

Norway Timelapse
PlayPlay

previous arrow
next arrow
Norway Timelapse
Budapest Timelapse
Iceland Timelapse
Berlin Timelapse
London Timelapse
previous arrow
next arrow

The self is constituted within a variety of arenas and in relation to multiple traditions. Self-hood, on this understanding, is both provisional and open-ended, and critically depends on the configuration of relationships between one’s own groups and those cultures and values that are deemed ��?other’. The regulation of alterity becomes a defining attribute of self-hood, as my sense of who I am is crucially mediated by an understanding of that which I am not (paraphrasing William Connolly).

Michael Kenny, Politics of Identity: Liberal Political Theory and the Dilemas of Difference

Related Authors: Michael Kenny | Politics of Identity: Liberal Political Theory | the Dilemas of Difference

Related Topics: alterity, relationships, self

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *