explaining event, choose three competing modes explanation. regularity — William A. Dembski, Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Small Probabilities

The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities William A. Dembski

Norway Timelapse
PlayPlay

previous arrow
next arrow
Norway Timelapse
Budapest Timelapse
Iceland Timelapse
Berlin Timelapse
London Timelapse
previous arrow
next arrow

Whenever explaining an event, we must choose from three competing modes of explanation. These are regularity, chance, and design… To attribute an event to design is to say that it cannot reasonably be referred to either regularity or chance.

William A. Dembski, The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities

Related Authors: William A. Dembski | The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities

Related Topics: biology, id, intelligent-design, science

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *