Teachers seeking ‘teach controversy’ Darwinian evolution today’s clima — David K. DeWolf, Traipsing Evolution: Intelligent Design Kitzmiller v. Dover Decision

Norway Timelapse
PlayPlay

previous arrow
next arrow
Norway Timelapse
Budapest Timelapse
Iceland Timelapse
Berlin Timelapse
London Timelapse
previous arrow
next arrow

Teachers seeking to 'teach the controversy' over Darwinian evolution in today's climate will likely be met with false warnings that it is unconstitutional to say anything negative about Darwinian evolution. Students who attempt to raise questions about Darwinism, or who try to elicit from the teacher an honest answer about the status of intelligent design theory will trigger administrators' concerns about whether they stand in Constitutional jeopardy. A chilling effect on open inquiry is being felt in several states already, including Ohio. South Carolina, and Pennsylvania. [District Court] Judge Jones's message is clear: give Darwin only praise, or else face the wrath of the judiciary.

David K. DeWolf, Traipsing Into Evolution: Intelligent Design and the Kitzmiller v. Dover Decision

Related Authors: David K. DeWolf | Traipsing Into Evolution: Intelligent Design | the Kitzmiller v. Dover Decision

Related Topics: biology, darwinism, evolution, id, intelligent-design, macro-evolution, macroevolution, science, scientific-inquiry

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *