essential prediction Darwinism that, given astronomical number chances — Michael J. Behe

Norway Timelapse
PlayPlay

previous arrow
next arrow
Norway Timelapse
Budapest Timelapse
Iceland Timelapse
Berlin Timelapse
London Timelapse
previous arrow
next arrow

The most essential prediction of Darwinism is that, given an astronomical number of chances, unintelligent processes can make seemingly-designed systems, ones of the complexity of those found in the cell. ID specifically denies this, predicting that in the absence of intelligent input no such systems would develop. So Darwinism and ID make clear, opposite predictions of what we should find when we examine genetic results from a stupendous number of organisms that are under relentless pressure from natural selection. The recent genetic results are a stringent test. The results: 1) Darwinism’s prediction is falsified; 2) Design’s prediction is confirmed.

Michael J. Behe

Related Authors: Michael J. Behe

Related Topics: biology, chance, darwinism, evolution, id, intelligent-design, macro-evolution, macroevolution, natural-selection, naturalism, predictions, science

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *