A second point caught attention persons insist upon keeping religion s — Phillip E. Johnson, Darwin Trial

Norway Timelapse
PlayPlay

previous arrow
next arrow
Norway Timelapse
Budapest Timelapse
Iceland Timelapse
Berlin Timelapse
London Timelapse
previous arrow
next arrow

A second point that caught my attention was that the very persons who insist upon keeping religion and science separate are eager to use their science as a basis for pronouncements about religion. The literature of Darwinism is full of anti-theistic conclusions, such as that the universe was not designed and has no purpose, and that we humans are the product of blind natural processes that care nothing about us. What is more, these statements are not presented as personal opinions but as the logical implications of evolutionary sc

Phillip E. Johnson, Darwin on Trial

Related Authors: Phillip E. Johnson | Darwin on Trial

Related Topics: creation-science, creationism, creationist, evolution, evolution-vs-creationism, evolution-vs-religion, religion, science

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *