approach creation-evolution dispute a scientist a problem law, means a — Phillip E. Johnson, Darwin Trial

Norway Timelapse
PlayPlay

previous arrow
next arrow
Norway Timelapse
Budapest Timelapse
Iceland Timelapse
Berlin Timelapse
London Timelapse
previous arrow
next arrow

I approach the creation-evolution dispute not as a scientist but as a problem of law, which means among other things that I know something about the ways that words are used in arguments. What first drew my attention to the question was the way the rules of argument seemed to be structured to make it impossible to question whether what we are being told about evolution is really true. For example, the Academy's rule against negative argument automatically eliminates the possibility that science has not discovered how complex organisms could have developed. However wrong the current answer may be, it stands until a better answer arrives. It is as if a criminal defendant were not allowed to present an alibi unless he could also show who did commit the crime.

Phillip E. Johnson, Darwin on Trial

Related Authors: Phillip E. Johnson | Darwin on Trial

Related Topics: biology, creation-science, creationism, evolution, evolution-vs-creationism, science

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *