distinguish legitimate skepticism scoffed cold fusion, stifling dogma — Thomas Gilovich, Know Isn’t So: Fallibility Human Reason Everyday Life

Norway Timelapse
PlayPlay

previous arrow
next arrow
Norway Timelapse
Budapest Timelapse
Iceland Timelapse
Berlin Timelapse
London Timelapse
previous arrow
next arrow

How do we distinguish between the legitimate skepticism of those who scoffed at cold fusion, and the stifling dogma of the seventeenthcentury clergymen who, doubting Galileo's claim that the earth was not the center of the solar system, put him under house arrest for the last eight years of his life? In part, the answer lies in the distinction between skepticism and closed-mindedness. Many scientists who were skeptical about cold fusion nevertheless tried to replicate the reported phenomenon in their own labs; Galileo's critics refused to look at the pertinent data.

Thomas Gilovich, How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life

Related Authors: Thomas Gilovich | How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life

Related Topics: human-behavior, logic, mind, psychology

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *